The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of total glycosides of Cistanche deserticola on the energy metabolism of human HepG2 cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1117364 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duo Feng, Shi-qi Zhou, Ya-xi Zhou, Yong-jun Jiang, Qiao-di Sun, Wei Song, Qian-qian Cui, Wen-jie Yan, Jing Wang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2023.
All research outputs
#20,851,754
of 23,467,261 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,869
of 5,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#327,071
of 416,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#315
of 505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,467,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.