↓ Skip to main content

Food consumption based on processing level (according to Nova system) during the COVID-19 pandemic among adolescents with immunocompromised conditions: a case-control study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Food consumption based on processing level (according to Nova system) during the COVID-19 pandemic among adolescents with immunocompromised conditions: a case-control study
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1141845
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriel P. Esteves, Bruna Caruso Mazzolani, Fabiana Infante Smaira, Heloísa C. Santo André, Amanda Yuri Iraha, Camilla Astley, Isabela Gouveia Marques, Milla Cordeiro Amarante, Nathalia Saffioti Rezende, Sofia Mendes Sieczkowska, Tathiane Christine Franco, Luana Cristina do Amaral Miranda, Lívia Lindoso, Alberto Carame Helito, Jane Oba, Ligia Bruni Queiroz, Rosa Maria R. Pereira, Lucia Maria A. Campos, Nadia E. Aikawa, Hamilton Roschel, Clovis A. Silva, Bruno Gualano

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic impacts on eating habits among adolescents may be more relevant in pediatric patients with immunocompromised chronic diseases. This case-control study conducted between June and October 2020 aimed to: (i) describe dietary patterns of adolescents with chronic conditions compared to healthy controls and (ii) determine associations between food consumption, health-related quality of life (HRQL) and sleep quality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants (184 immunocompromised and 58 healthy adolescents, aged 14.3 [SD 2.5]) responded to HRQL and sleep validated instruments (PedsQL and PSQI) and three 24 h food recalls via online software. Adjusted linear and logistic regressions were used to assess differences in dietary patterns and associations between food consumption (according to Nova classification) and HRQL and sleep quality. Adolescents with gastrohepatic, rheumatic, and kidney diseases had an improved dietary pattern vs. their healthy peers, showing greater consumption of unprocessed and minimally processed foods (unstandardized coefficient (b) = 7.35%[95%CI 1.59; 13.1]; b = 15.10%[95%CI 7.00; 23.1]; and b = 11.2%[95%CI 5.68; 16.8]), and lower consumption of ultraprocessed foods (b = −7.53%[95%CI-12.90; −2.18]; b = −11.4%[95%CI-18.90; −3.94]; b = −10.8%[95%CI-16.00; −5.68]). Consumption of culinary ingredients was associated with reduced psychological HRQL in controls (standardized coefficient (β) = −0.26[95%CI-0.52; −0.004]), and processed food consumption was associated with improved sleep latency in immunocompromised participants (β = 0.16[95%CI 0.01; 0.31]). These findings suggest diet quality may play a role in HRQL and sleep quality in this population, and may be relevant for clinical practitioners and policy makers when considering the importance of dietary quality in immunocompromised youths.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unspecified 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2023.
All research outputs
#16,505,990
of 24,288,381 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,092
of 5,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,325
of 368,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#186
of 456 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,288,381 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 456 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.