The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can home visits for early child development be implemented with sufficient coverage and quality at scale? Evidence from the SPRING program in India and Pakistan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1152548 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zelee Hill, Shamsa Zafar, Seyi Soremekun, Siham Sikander, Bilal Iqbal Avan, Reetabrata Roy, Sarmad Aziz, Divya Kumar, Nazia Parveen, Shumaila Saleem, Deepali Verma, Kamal Kant Sharma, Jolene Skordis, Assad Hafeez, Atif Rahman, Betty Kirkwood, Gauri Divan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,598,004
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,132
of 7,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,664
of 387,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#180
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.