↓ Skip to main content

Bioactive polysaccharides from lotus as potent food supplements: a review of their preparation, structures, biological features and application prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioactive polysaccharides from lotus as potent food supplements: a review of their preparation, structures, biological features and application prospects
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1171004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guona Dai, Jiale Wang, Jiamei Zheng, Conglong Xia, Yaping Wang, Baozhong Duan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,346,871
of 26,202,139 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,584
of 7,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,499
of 382,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#281
of 487 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,202,139 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 487 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.