↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Functional and innovative food ingredients: assessment of analytical, microbiological and sensory aspects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Functional and innovative food ingredients: assessment of analytical, microbiological and sensory aspects
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1207323
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberta Foligni, Andrea Pulvirenti, Luciana De Vero, Cinzia Mannozzi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2023.
All research outputs
#21,108,314
of 23,757,348 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,026
of 5,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,417
of 222,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#144
of 245 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,757,348 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 245 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.