You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutritional status in perianal Crohn’s disease: are we underestimating the impact?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1271825 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno Augusto Alves Martins, Oswaldo de Moraes Filho, Ana Carolina Benvindo Lopes, Ricardo Jacarandá de Faria, Clíslian Silva, Gabriela de Oliveira Lemos, Dannilo Brito Silveira, João Batista de Sousa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2023.
All research outputs
#13,668,433
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,976
of 6,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,171
of 177,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#50
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.