↓ Skip to main content

Ameliorative effect of black tea extract on the skin of D-galactose-induced aging mice

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ameliorative effect of black tea extract on the skin of D-galactose-induced aging mice
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, September 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2023.1275199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaojie Zheng, Wenbin Deng, Xinzhou Wang, Zufang Wu, Chong Li, Xin Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#21,914,735
of 24,451,685 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,483
of 6,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,979
of 174,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#118
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,451,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,034 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.