You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A nutritional supplement taken during preconception and pregnancy influences human milk macronutrients in women with overweight/obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1282376 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Soo Min Han, José G. B. Derraik, Mark H. Vickers, Surabhi Devaraj, Fang Huang, Wei Wei Pang, Keith M. Godfrey, Shiao-Yng Chan, Sagar K. Thakkar, Wayne S. Cutfield, NiPPeR Study Group, Benjamin B. Albert, Shelia J. Barton, Aristea Binia, Mary Cavanagh, Hsin Fang Chang, Yap Seng Chong, Mary F. Chong, Cathryn Conlon, Cyrus Cooper, Paula Costello, Vanessa Cox, Christine Creagh, Marysia Depczynski, Sarah El-Heis, Judith Hammond, Zhang Han, Nicholas C. Harvey, Mrunalini Jagtap, Timothy Kenealy, Heidi Nield, Justin M. O’Sullivan, Gernalia Satianegara, Irma Silva-Zolezzi, Shu E. Soh, Vicky Tay, Rachael Taylor, Elizabeth Tham, Philip Titcombe, Clare Wall, Ray Wong, Gladys Woon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 15% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Mathematics | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#15,477,136
of 24,630,122 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,622
of 6,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,119
of 152,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#47
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,630,122 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.