The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A multi-center prospective study of plant-based nutritional support in adult community-based patients at risk of disease-related malnutrition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, November 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1297624 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Delsoglio, Corbin Griffen, Rakshan Syed, Tobias Cookson, Hanorah Saliba, Amanda Vowles, Samuel Davies, Nicola Willey, Jennifer Thomas, Nicola Millen, Nour Odeh, Jayne Longstaff, Naomi Westran, Lindsey Allan, Hannah Offer, Chloe Howell, Meg Sanders, Kirsty Gaffigan, Kirby Garrett, Sally Foster, Agnes Salt, Emily Carter, Sarah Moore, Nick Bergin, Jane Roper, Joe Alvarez, Christine Voss, Teresa Connolly, Clare MacDonald, Tracey Thrower, Darren Sills, Janet Baxter, Rhonda Manning, Lynsey Gray, Karen Voas, Scot Richardson, Anne-Marie Hurren, Daniel Murphy, Susan Blake, Paul McArdle, Sinead Walsh, Lucy Booth, Louise Albrich, Sarah Ashley-Maguire, Joanna Allison, Sarah Brook, Rebecca Capener, Gary P. Hubbard, Rebecca J. Stratton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,683,159
of 25,355,907 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,941
of 6,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,330
of 348,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#68
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,355,907 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.