You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chronic almond nut snacking alleviates perceived muscle soreness following downhill running but does not improve indices of cardiometabolic health in mildly overweight, middle-aged, adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1298868 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leah Siegel, Jessica Rooney, Lindsey Marjoram, Lauren Mason, Elena Bowles, Thomas Valente van Keulen, Carina Helander, Vernon Rayo, Mee Young Hong, Changqi Liu, Shirin Hooshmand, Mark Kern, Oliver C. Witard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
Unknown | 10 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 315. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#112,537
of 26,176,714 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#72
of 7,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,670
of 371,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1
of 418 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,176,714 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 418 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.