The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Moderate or greater daily coffee consumption is associated with lower incidence of metabolic syndrome in Taiwanese militaries: results from the CHIEF cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, December 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1321916 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kun-Zhe Tsai, Wei-Chun Huang, Xuemei Sui, Carl J. Lavie, Gen-Min Lin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 44% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 31% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,346,215
of 26,580,681 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,122
of 7,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,505
of 393,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#34
of 374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,580,681 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.