The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationship between skeletal muscle index at the third lumbar vertebra with infection risk and long-term prognosis in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2023.1327832 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Juan Wang, Jinjia Bai, Huimin Wang, Guofen Xu, Ruoyu Yao, Jing Li, Wenrui Zhang, Han Wang, Jia Yao, Xiaojing Ren |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#21,432,417
of 26,303,092 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,631
of 7,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,428
of 378,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#221
of 415 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,303,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 415 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.