The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The antioxidant activity of polysaccharides from Armillaria gallica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1277877 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peiwen Su, Honghao Qiu, Lishan Liang, Luo Weng, Yingjie Liu, Jiajun Liu, Liyan Wu, Fanxin Meng |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#21,091,090
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,514
of 7,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,853
of 363,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#293
of 462 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,123 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 462 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.