The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Values of prognostic nutritional index for predicting Kawasaki disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1305775 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiaoling Zhong, Yu Xie, Hui Wang, Guihua Chen, Taoyi Yang, Jiang Xie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#20,695,088
of 25,418,993 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,391
of 6,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,031
of 265,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#265
of 372 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,418,993 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 372 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.