The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Higher serum ascorbic acid levels are associated with lower depression prevalence in US adults: a case-control study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1324835 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mengyuan Chen, Haolong Luo, Yan Han, Yuanhong Li, Li Zhou, Xiangmei Ren |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 51 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 38 | 72% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 15% |
Scientists | 5 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,559,313
of 26,415,653 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#747
of 7,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,728
of 381,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#28
of 421 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,415,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,589 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 421 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.