↓ Skip to main content

Validity and applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Validity and applicability of the global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria in non-dialysis patients with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, February 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1340153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Huang, Qian Wang, Yayong Luo, Zhengchun Tang, Fang Liu, Ruimin Zhang, Guangyan Cai, Jing Huang, Li Zhang, Li Zeng, Xueying Cao, Jian Yang, Yong Wang, Keyun Wang, Yaqing Li, Qihu Li, Xiangmei Chen, Zheyi Dong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Unknown 4 80%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2024.
All research outputs
#16,421,110
of 25,927,633 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,087
of 7,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,473
of 357,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#155
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,927,633 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.