↓ Skip to main content

Dietary choline intake and colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study of 2005–2018 NHANES cycles

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary choline intake and colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional study of 2005–2018 NHANES cycles
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1352535
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xijuan Xu, Hongan Ying, Lili Huang, Weiwen Hong, Wenbin Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,316,412
of 26,178,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,549
of 7,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,007
of 208,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#109
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.