The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low levels of Vitamin D during pregnancy associated with gestational diabetes mellitus and low birth weight: results from the MAASTHI birth cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1352617 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R. Deepa, Onno C. P. Van Schayck, Giridhara R. Babu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 54% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,903,382
of 26,480,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,277
of 7,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,698
of 317,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#53
of 486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,480,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.