The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Longitudinal gut microbial signals are associated with weight loss: insights from a digital therapeutics program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1363079 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shreyas V. Kumbhare, Inti Pedroso, Bharat Joshi, Karthik M. Muthukumar, Santosh K. Saravanan, Carmel Irudayanathan, Gursimran S. Kochhar, Parambir S. Dulai, Ranjan Sinha, Daniel E. Almonacid |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#1,667,687
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#787
of 7,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,618
of 193,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#11
of 337 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 337 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.