The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Editorial: Chemical composition, processing, and health-promoting potential of unconventional food plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1368629 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Anete Santana Valente, Daniela da Silva Oliveira, Ângela Giovana Batista, Ceres Mattos Della Lucia, Leandro de Morais Cardoso |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#21,251,718
of 26,096,076 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,517
of 7,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,333
of 347,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#228
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,096,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.