You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating carbon and water footprints associated with commercial milk formula production and use: development and implications of the Green Feeding Climate Action Tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1371036 |
| Authors |
Julie P. Smith, Bindi Borg, Tuan T. Nguyen, Alessandro Iellamo, Andini Pramono, Roger Mathisen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 8% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 38% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,737,017
of 26,182,648 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,176
of 7,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,044
of 183,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#23
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,182,648 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.