The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A review on nutritional quality of animal and plant-based milk alternatives: a focus on protein
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1378556 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Romdhane Karoui, Inès Bouaicha |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 33% |
Other | 2 | 33% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 17% |
Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 17% |
Materials Science | 1 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2024.
All research outputs
#23,656,949
of 26,335,402 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#5,548
of 7,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,495
of 184,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#140
of 322 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,335,402 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,471 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 322 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.