↓ Skip to main content

Design and optimization of heat pump with infrared drying for Glycyrrhiza uralensis (Licorice) processing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Design and optimization of heat pump with infrared drying for Glycyrrhiza uralensis (Licorice) processing
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1382296
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lichun Zhu, Yongkang Xie, Mengqing Li, Xuetao Zhang, Xinyu Ji, Xiaoqiang Zhang, Hongbo Zhu, Junzhe Gu, Qian Zhang, Xuhai Yang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,282,000
of 25,947,988 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#5,291
of 7,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,848
of 141,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#71
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,947,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,157 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.