The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Supplementation of Crataegi fructus alleviates functional dyspepsia and restores gut microbiota in mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, April 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1385159 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liyu Hao, Zeyue Yu, Jianhui Sun, Zongyuan Li, Jianliang Li, Yurong Deng, Hanhui Huang, Hairu Huo, Hongmei Li, Luqi Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,462,250
of 26,398,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,497
of 7,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,653
of 350,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#140
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,398,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.