↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Plant's bioactivity in modern health and diet: benefits, limitations and trendy application

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Plant's bioactivity in modern health and diet: benefits, limitations and trendy application
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1385444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aleksandar Ž. Kostić, Dasha Mihaylova, Nadezhda Traycheva Petkova

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#21,261,664
of 26,108,988 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,519
of 7,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,655
of 346,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#225
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,108,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.