The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of biological signatures of cruciferous vegetable consumption utilizing machine learning-based global untargeted stable isotope traced metabolomics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1390223 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John A. Bouranis, Yijie Ren, Laura M. Beaver, Jaewoo Choi, Carmen P. Wong, Lily He, Maret G. Traber, Jennifer Kelly, Sarah L. Booth, Jan F. Stevens, Xiaoli Z. Fern, Emily Ho |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2024.
All research outputs
#23,571,531
of 26,242,030 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#5,452
of 7,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,178
of 149,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#109
of 259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,242,030 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.