↓ Skip to main content

Association between weight-adjusted-waist index and cognitive decline in US elderly participants

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between weight-adjusted-waist index and cognitive decline in US elderly participants
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1390282
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiaxin Li, Jian Sun, Yishuo Zhang, Bo Zhang, Liya Zhou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2024.
All research outputs
#7,295,553
of 26,439,667 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,073
of 7,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,351
of 314,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#87
of 484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,439,667 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.