The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Antioxidant activities, dietary nutrients, and yield potential of bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.) lines in diverse growing environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1393476 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gograj Singh Jat, Tusar Kanti Behera, Awani Kumar Singh, Ram Swaroop Bana, Deepak Singh, Samarth Godara, Umesh K. Reddy, P. Gangadhara Rao, H. Ram, N. D. Vinay, Sachin Kumar, Bhoopal Singh Tomar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,463,112
of 26,451,700 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,430
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,555
of 148,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#18
of 277 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,451,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 277 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.