The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between dietary intake of selenium and chronic kidney disease in US adults: a cross-sectional study of NHANES 2015–2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1396470 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ying Pi, Xianyong Liao, Xiaodan Song, Yuyu Cao, Xiaona Tang, Guobing Lin, Yanghong Zhong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2024.
All research outputs
#17,567,743
of 26,544,375 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,578
of 7,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,284
of 178,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#82
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,544,375 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.