The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study on the relationship between berry, grape, red wine consumption and cognitive impairment in middle-aged and elderly people in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1403427 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xinting Jiang, Meirong Chen, Liang Cui, Qihao Guo, Lin Huang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 5 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,952,903
of 26,449,643 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,766
of 7,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,883
of 243,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#55
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,449,643 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.