↓ Skip to main content

The effects of specific vegetable subtypes on constipation incidence in the general United States population

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effects of specific vegetable subtypes on constipation incidence in the general United States population
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1403636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chenyu Jiang, Yaojian Shao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,608,491
of 26,523,931 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#4,855
of 7,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,818
of 230,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#184
of 401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,523,931 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.