The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of vitamin E, vitamin B6, and niacin intake on cataract incidence based on NHANES 2005-2008 data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1406147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guo-Bin Zhuang, Xiang Li, Shi-Nan Wu, Si-Qi Zhang, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Nuo Dong |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 32% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2024.
All research outputs
#3,596,246
of 26,518,120 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,499
of 7,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,801
of 178,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#23
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,518,120 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.