The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bone mineral density and body composition in Australians following plant-based diets vs. regular meat diets
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1411003 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Grace Austin, Jessica J. A. Ferguson, Shaun Eslick, Christopher Oldmeadow, Lisa G. Wood, Manohar L. Garg |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2024.
All research outputs
#16,424,725
of 26,365,186 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,034
of 7,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,225
of 253,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#90
of 425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,365,186 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.