↓ Skip to main content

Genetically determined dietary habits and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetically determined dietary habits and risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization study
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1415555
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fei Teng, Jiahui Sun, Zheyu Chen, Hao Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,867,964
of 26,170,895 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#1,494
of 7,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,828
of 213,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#38
of 352 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,170,895 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 352 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.