The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dietary advanced glycation end-products and their associations with body weight on a Mediterranean diet and low-fat vegan diet: a randomized, cross-over trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1426642 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hana Kahleova, Tatiana Znayenko-Miller, Giulianna Motoa, Emma Eng, Alex Prevost, Jaime Uribarri, Richard Holubkov, Neal D. Barnard |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 22% |
Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2024.
All research outputs
#247,225
of 26,527,568 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#159
of 7,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,806
of 186,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2
of 312 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,527,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 312 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.