The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Associations between dietary antioxidant vitamins and risk of glioma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1428528 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ya-Jun Ni, Yi-Qian Huang, Lin Yu, Xiao-Yan Zhang, Qin Zhu, Long Shu, Lun Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2024.
All research outputs
#18,098,929
of 26,480,347 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#3,921
of 7,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,852
of 160,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#77
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,480,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.