The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Causal association of dietary factors with five common cancers: univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1428844 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lin Yang, Li Wang, Erhao Bao, Jiahao Wang, Pingyu Zhu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 14 | 27% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 36 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 43 | 84% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2024.
All research outputs
#1,108,708
of 26,526,880 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#558
of 7,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,971
of 214,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#8
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,880 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.