The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association between dietary magnesium intake and pelvic inflammatory disease in US women: a cross-sectional study of NHANES
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnut.2024.1430730 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zeru Chen, Zichun Wu, Yuying Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 38% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2024.
All research outputs
#7,758,382
of 26,498,650 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#2,253
of 7,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,760
of 169,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#46
of 303 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,498,650 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 303 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.