↓ Skip to main content

Association between copper intake and essential hypertension: dual evidence from Mendelian randomization analysis and the NHANES database

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between copper intake and essential hypertension: dual evidence from Mendelian randomization analysis and the NHANES database
Published in
Frontiers in Nutrition, August 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnut.2024.1454669
Authors

Qing Miao, Jingtao Zhang, Yingjie Yun, Wei Wu, Chuanjin Luo

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2024.
All research outputs
#23,886,387
of 26,588,565 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Nutrition
#5,827
of 7,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,500
of 161,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Nutrition
#191
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,588,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.