The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Addressing Cancer Disparities Among American Indians through Innovative Technologies and Patient Navigation: The Walking Forward Experience
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2011.00011 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Daniel G. Petereit, B. Ashleigh Guadagnolo, Rosemary Wong, C. Norman Coleman |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,100,417
of 26,414,132 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,827
of 23,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,865
of 195,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,414,132 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.