↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric High Grade Glioma: a Review and Update on Tumor Clinical Characteristics and Biology

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pediatric High Grade Glioma: a Review and Update on Tumor Clinical Characteristics and Biology
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2012.00105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Fangusaro

Abstract

High grade gliomas (HGG) are one of the most common central nervous system (CNS) tumors encountered in adults, but they only represent approximately 8-12% of all pediatric CNS tumors. Historically, pediatric HGG were thought to be similar to adult HGG since they appear histologically identical; however, molecular, genetic, and biologic data reveal that they are distinct. Similar to adults, pediatric HGG are very aggressive and malignant lesions with few patients achieving long-term survival despite a variety of therapies. Initial treatment strategies typically consist of a gross total resection (GTR) when feasible followed by focal radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy. Over the last few decades, a wealth of data has emerged from basic science and pre-clinical animal models helping to better define the common biologic, genetic, and molecular make-up of these tumors. These data have not only provided a better understanding of tumor biology, but they have also provided new areas of research targeting molecular and genetic pathways with the potential for novel treatment strategies and improved patient outcomes. Here we provide a review of pediatric non-brainstem HGG, including epidemiology, presentation, histology, imaging characteristics, treatments, survival outcomes, and an overview of both basic and translational research. An understanding of all relevant pre-clinical tumor models, including their strengths and pitfalls is essential in realizing improved patient outcomes in this population.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 208 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Master 16 8%
Other 15 7%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 11%
Neuroscience 17 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 56 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#15,927
of 22,440 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,625
of 250,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#100
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,440 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.