↓ Skip to main content

MicroRNAs in Ewing Sarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MicroRNAs in Ewing Sarcoma
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2013.00065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Layne Dylla, Colin Moore, Paul Jedlicka

Abstract

MicroRNAs (miRs) have emerged recently as important regulators of gene expression in the cell. Frequently dysregulated in cancer, miRs have shed new light on molecular mechanisms of oncogenesis, and have generated substantial interest as biomarkers, and novel therapeutic agents and targets. Recently, a number of studies have examined miR biology in Ewing sarcoma. Findings indicate that alterations in miR expression in Ewing Sarcoma are widespread, involve both EWS/Ets oncogenic fusion-dependent and independent mechanisms, and contribute to malignant phenotypes. miRs with prognostic potential have been identified, and several preclinical studies suggest that miR manipulation could be therapeutically useful in this aggressive disease. These and future studies of miR biology stand to expand our understanding of Ewing sarcoma pathogenesis, and may identify new biomarkers and treatment options.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2015.
All research outputs
#21,096,544
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,575
of 22,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,642
of 291,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#179
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,836 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.