↓ Skip to main content

Differential Roles of PML Isoforms

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
17 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential Roles of PML Isoforms
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2013.00125
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sébastien Nisole, Mohamed Ali Maroui, Xavier H. Mascle, Muriel Aubry, Mounira K. Chelbi-Alix

Abstract

The tumor suppressor promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein is fused to the retinoic acid receptor alpha in patients suffering from acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Treatment of APL patients with arsenic trioxide (As2O3) reverses the disease phenotype by a process involving the degradation of the fusion protein via its PML moiety. Several PML isoforms are generated from a single PML gene by alternative splicing. They share the same N-terminal region containing the RBCC/tripartite motif but differ in their C-terminal sequences. Recent studies of all the PML isoforms reveal the specific functions of each. Here, we review the nomenclature and structural organization of the PML isoforms in order to clarify the various designations and classifications found in different databases. The functions of the PML isoforms and their differential roles in antiviral defense also are reviewed. Finally, the key players involved in the degradation of the PML isoforms in response to As2O3 or other inducers are discussed.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Researcher 18 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 4%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 6%
Unspecified 2 1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 37 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,297,977
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,099
of 22,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,682
of 289,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#55
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,544 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.