↓ Skip to main content

Recapitulating the Tumor Ecosystem Along the Metastatic Cascade Using 3D Culture Models

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recapitulating the Tumor Ecosystem Along the Metastatic Cascade Using 3D Culture Models
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, July 2015
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2015.00170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiyun Kim, Kandice Tanner

Abstract

Advances in cancer research have shown that a tumor can be likened to a foreign species that disrupts delicately balanced ecological interactions, compromising the survival of normal tissue ecosystems. In efforts to mitigate tumor expansion and metastasis, experimental approaches from ecology are becoming more frequently and successfully applied by researchers from diverse disciplines to reverse engineer and re-engineer biological systems in order to normalize the tumor ecosystem. We present a review on the use of 3D biomimetic platforms to recapitulate biotic and abiotic components of the tumor ecosystem, in efforts to delineate the underlying mechanisms that drive evolution of tumor heterogeneity, tumor dissemination, and acquisition of drug resistance.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 1%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 4 4%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 22 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 16%
Engineering 9 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,529,210
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#4,690
of 22,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,036
of 276,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#23
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,839 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.