↓ Skip to main content

Scientific Rationale Supporting the Clinical Development Strategy for the Investigational Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib in Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scientific Rationale Supporting the Clinical Development Strategy for the Investigational Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor Alisertib in Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2015.00189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huifeng Niu, Mark Manfredi, Jeffrey A. Ecsedy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 70 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 16%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 21 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2024.
All research outputs
#7,770,673
of 26,522,772 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,795
of 23,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,750
of 278,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#10
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,772 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.