The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Active Role of the Necrotic Zone in Desensitization of Hypoxic Macrophages and Regulation of CSC-Fate: A hypothesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2018.00235 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maryam Mehrabi, Fatemeh Amini, Shima Mehrabi |
| Abstract |
Fast-proliferating cancer cells in the hypoxic region face a shortage of oxygen and nutrients, undergo necrotic cell death, and release numerous signaling components. Hypoxia-induced chemo-attractants signal for macrophages/monocytes to clear debris and return the system to steady state. Accordingly, macrophages arrange into pre-necrotic positions, where they are continuously exposed to stress signals. It can thus be hypothesized that gradual alteration of gene expression in macrophages eventually turns off their phagocytic machinery. Uncleared cell corpses within the hypoxic region potentially provide a rich source of building blocks for anaerobic metabolism of cancer stem cells via macropinocytosis, and are conceivably implicated in tumor progression and invasion. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 77% |
| Scientists | 5 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 4 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 24% |
| Engineering | 3 | 12% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,270,385
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#915
of 22,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,930
of 342,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#19
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,428 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.