↓ Skip to main content

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
125 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Head and Neck Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, August 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00310
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin David Forster, Michael-John Devlin

Abstract

Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) is the 6th most common cancer globally and commonly presents with locally advanced disease, which has a recurrence rate of around 50% despite aggressive multi-modality treatment involving surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy or EGFR inhibition where appropriate. As understanding of the underlying cancer biology and the complex interactions within the tumor microenvironment improves, there is gathering interest in and evidence for the role of immunomodulating agents in the management of HNSCC. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, which aim to hinder the inhibitory interaction between programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1, have demonstrated durable improvements in patient outcomes in advanced / metastatic HNSCC, with both pembrolizumab and nivolumab being granted FDA approval in 2016. There are numerous ongoing clinical trials exploring the role of checkpoint inhibitors both as single agents and in combination, administered with established treatment modalities such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, as well as alongside other novel immune modulators. These trials are not limited to advanced / metastatic HNSCC, but also to the neo-adjuvant or adjuvant settings. As studies complete and more results become available, the role immunotherapy agents will have within the treatment strategies for HNSCC may change, with increasing biomarker selection resulting in personalized therapy aiming to further improve patient outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 125 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Other 14 11%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 22 18%
Unknown 30 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 34 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2019.
All research outputs
#7,660,272
of 26,215,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,732
of 22,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,247
of 348,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#49
of 178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,936 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.