You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrated Analysis of a Competing Endogenous RNA Network Revealing a Prognostic Signature for Cervical Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2018.00368 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leilei Xia, Han Wang, Shengyun Cai, Xiaoling Su, Jizi Shen, Qi Meng, Yu Chen, Li Li, Jiuqiong Yan, Caihong Zhang, Mingjuan Xu |
| Abstract |
Given the high morbidity and the trend of younger individuals being affected observed in cervical cancer, it is important to identify sensitive and effective biomarkers for predicting the survival outcome of patients. Based on data from 307 cervical cancer cases acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas portal, 1920 differentially expressed mRNAs, 70 microRNAs(miRNAs), and 493 long non-coding(lncRNAs) were screened by comparing cervical cancer tissues with paracancerous tissues. A competing endogenous (ceRNA) network containing 50 lncRNAs, 16 miRNAs, and 81 mRNAs was constructed. Eighteen RNAs, comprising 13 mRNAs, 2 miRNAs, and 3 lncRNAs, were identified as significant prognostic factors by univariate Cox proportional hazards regression. ETS-related gene and fatty acid synthase signatures were discovered using a multivariate Cox regression model built to identify independent prognostic factors in cervical cancer patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off value for distinguishing the risk level of cervical cancer patients. High-risk patients exhibited a poorer prognosis than low-risk patients did. This study focused on ceRNA networks to provide a novel perspective and insight into cervical cancer and suggested that the identified signature can serve as an independent prognostic biomarker in cervical cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 41% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#22,867,974
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#16,070
of 22,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,939
of 345,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#151
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.