↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, December 2018
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2018.00630
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad Chaddad, Tamim Niazi, Stephan Probst, Franck Bladou, Maurice Anidjar, Boris Bahoric

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 29 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Engineering 7 10%
Computer Science 6 8%
Physics and Astronomy 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 33 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,640
of 22,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,902
of 443,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#69
of 216 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 216 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.