You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tumor Tissue Explant Culture of Patient-Derived Xenograft as Potential Prioritization Tool for Targeted Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.00017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susmita Ghosh, Manu Prasad, Kiran Kundu, Limor Cohen, Ksenia M. Yegodayev, Jonathan Zorea, Ben-Zion Joshua, Batel Lasry, Orr Dimitstein, Anat Bahat-Dinur, Aviram Mizrachi, Vladimir Lazar, Moshe Elkabets, Angel Porgador |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 3 | 38% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#5,407,995
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,923
of 22,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,300
of 446,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#42
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.